A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning future neighbours about the construction of the wall in a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated nationwide focus adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, significantly inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially created, is in the right situation. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-high water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image that has considering that come to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Times reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the water for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the location became Among the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of steps have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second inside the legal timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as produced, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become referred to as meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and problems attached for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about making sure that development Paul Feely and René Collier at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have explained their lengthy-standing connection to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just wanting to develop a family members home in accordance Using the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Area of Conservation and say that all operates are actually completed according to Expert information and permitted programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea during a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your predicament that many observers see as progressively typical. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times report about René Collier noted the businessman had Earlier been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by way of waist-large water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting equally the Actual physical fact in the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the result stays unsure. The court will have to establish whether or not the wall as designed complies with organizing authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. Still the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who should Reside together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design works at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case extend outside of that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues for instance environmental security and assets legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of all-natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly designed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Regardless of whether it's going to in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.